Monday, September 22, 2014

A New Understanding of the Digital Divide

http://www.edutopia.org/blog/digital-divide-technology-internet-access-mary-beth-hertz

This article discusses how the definition of digital divide has changed in the last ten years. Ten years ago it was defined simply as those who do not have access to technology. Now that definition has changed. It’s not so much that people do not have access to technology, it’s that they don’t have access to the same type of technology. When looking at how people access the internet, it can be accessed in many ways. You can use your cell phone, a game console, a laptop, etc. However, the article mentioned that even though you can access the internet through a game console, you can’t update a resume with it. The divide then becomes a new thing:  “This creates an entertainment vs. empowerment divide.”
The author states that your socio and economic status affect where you are in this divide. Studies have shown that rural households and those with disabilities are also trending as those who are having issues with “empowerment” access.  There will always be demographics that do not receive this access for a variety of reasons. The issue now is how do you provide for them?
Solutions to better access are varied. The article listed a specific solution from an internet providing company. Comcast has introduced an “Internet Essentials” package for families that get free school lunches. This is a program that has to be applied for by a certain date and you must qualify. Families have the possibility of receiving 6 months of free internet access. After that, payments become around $10 a month plus tax. To help the rural families, the article discusses that the infrastructure must change to allow access. The author also states that the internet can become mobile, much like a library book-mobile.

I do think this article is interesting as it doesn’t just talk about access, but appropriate and helpful access. As teachers, we can come up with creative ways to help our students. Like we discussed, it’s differentiating instruction according to the needs of the child. You can’t punish a child because they do not have the right material to complete the task. I am curious to see how this divide trends in another 10 years. 

5 comments:

  1. Very interesting, Jessica! I love the wording of "empowerment vs. entertainment." I have never thought about technology in those ways. When thinking of my own classroom and the demographics...it hits the nail on the head. No matter the socioeconomic status of my students, they all have access to gaming entertainment. I think of those same students, and many do not have access to internet or word processing at hope. It will be interesting how society tries to bridge the gap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It seems like no matter what people do, the divide between socio-economic classes continues to pose problems for schools. As a rural school, the only way we were able to go 1:1 was due to an inheritance gifted by someone who lived in town. When my school first went 1:1, there was a huge discussion about what to do with the students who do not have internet access, and who do not have technological support at home. We have had to do major upgrades to our network, and allow students to have time to work on online assignments at school. If schools do not have the ability to help their students, the types of technology, and how information is accessed with continue to be an issue between the haves, and the have nots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thought this article was very interesting! It is amazing to think just how fast and how much technology has changed in the last ten years! I think there is always the ongoing discussion of what to do with those students who do not have a device or access and I don't really see this conversation going away. I think there will always be something that will divide people from one another, but it is interesting to think how it might change ten years from now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder if we are in a current sweet spot with digital access. Meaning ... are we at the point where it's as good as it's going to get? I look at the economy and see economic strain ahead. All around central Illinois we have rural dwellers with limited or no Internet access. As families assess their expenses will home access decline? Fortunately our schools continue to improve the connection options. Perhaps this ability to connect at school will allow more people to go offline at home. As an egocentric culture we struggle to empathize with people having different problems than our own. City dwellers have had better Internet access for longer than rural residents. Since the problem of connectivity does not affect them as much (except for monetary constraints) I think they assume everyone has access. Rural residents see that they can survive without the Internet and they probably assume everyone can live that way. These are differences in attitude that may not change even if the infrastructure improves.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good article. I remember reading the book, Digital Divide, years ago. Maggie is right. Technology has evolved in the past ten years. That is why I don't think we are in a "sweet spot". I don' t think we have any idea what will be out there in the next ten years!

    ReplyDelete